If you are a football fan, you probably remember Götze’s title-scoring goal for Germany in Sunday’s world-championship final. If you are not a football fan, you probably remember the pleasant evenings you spent before the football craze set in. The memories are clear before your inner eye, but how do you store them in your brain?
Neuroscientists know that one brain region, called the hippocampus, is our memory storage. However, they have three different theories of how the brain cells, or neurons, in this region can store the memory of Götze’s goal. According to the first theory, one neuron encodes this memory. So this neuron, and only this neuron, sends a signal when you think of Götze scoring – you have a “goal neuron”. The second theory states that many neurons together send signals in a pattern, and this pattern is typical only of your goal memory. But each neuron also contributes to many other memories, like that of the cool beer you drank alongside. Basically, you have a “goal pattern”. The third theory falls in the middle: only a few neurons signal when you think of Götze’s goal, and each neuron also stores a few other memories. But which theory is true?
Psychologists in the US tested this by looking at the brain activity of people recognizing familiar versus new words. The participants in the study were epilepsy patients who wore wire electrodes in preparation for possible surgery, with the aim to find out where in the brain seizures took place. To test how their brains store memory, the researchers gave participants a list of 32 words, which they studied. In the memory test, they were shown 64 words – the 32 from the original list, and 32 new words. The participants were asked to say which ones were “old” words and which ones “new”. Using the electrodes, the research could see the areas of the hippocampus in which neurons sent signals when a new or old word was shown. They found that neurons in some areas signal more often when the participant sees an “old” word rather than a “new” word. For each area, neurons only signal when the participant sees a few “old” words.
This supports the third theory: it is likely that in the hippocampus our memory of Götze’s goal is stored by a group of a few neurons. Each of these neurons, together with a different group of neurons, also stores a few other memories – maybe that of Argentina’s very near misses.
You probably strongly associate your partner’s perfume with the person you love. A change in perfume can be nothing less than disconcerting at first, but over time you become accustomed to it (unless it’s a really bad choice, then you might want to give some advice in the perfume department..). Why is it that we can associate a smell with a person, but then also adapt this association to a new smell? Neuroscientists reported in the Journal of Neuroscience in April that (at least in mice) this is due to neurons born in the brain during adult life. We tend to think of the brain as something solidly build before birth, with only re-wiring and re-fining going on after birth. But neurons are constantly born from neural stem cells and migrate to the olfactory bulb, the part of the brain that is required for smelling.
In mice, newborn neurons migrate into the olfactory bulb where they become so-called granule cells. Granule cells are inhibitory interneurons, which means that they connect other neurons and send signals that dampen their excitability. In fact, the researchers show that most of the granule cells in the olfactory bulb are generated after birth, and integrate with existing neurons into neural circuits. But why do we need a constant stream of new neurons and new connections? To find out, the researchers switched off the newborn interneurons in the olfactory bulb by turning off the release of signals from these neurons. They then compared the performance of these treated mice in a habituation-dishabituation test with untreated mice. In this test, the mice were trained to associate one of two smells with a sugar reward. Both mice with switched-off newborn neurons and untreated mice respond more to the smell associated with a reward, digging longer near the reward-associated smell than the non-rewarded smell. So mice do not need the newly generated neurons to associate a smell with a reward. The researchers then tested if they could retrain the mice, so that they associate the other smell with the reward. For normal mice, this task is no problem. The treated mice are unable to make the switch, and spend the same amount of time digging near both smells. This suggests that the newly born neurons in the olfactory bulb give mice the flexibility to learn odor associations, and relearn them if the context changes.
Our brain keeps itself fresh, and allows you to deal with change when your partner decides to change things up to keep fresh too.
The original research paper appeared in the Journal of Neuroscience on April 23.